<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Laws of Biology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paraschopra.com/blog/biology/laws-of-biology.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paraschopra.com/blog/biology/laws-of-biology.htm?nucrss=1</link>
	<description>business + science + philosophy + technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 18:14:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paras Chopra</title>
		<link>http://paraschopra.com/blog/biology/laws-of-biology.htm/comment-page-1#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Paras Chopra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:44:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">GUID#comment-36</guid>
		<description>That is all right. But, the point I was trying to make in the post was that the use of mathematics in biology community is not prevalent. The once case you have provided should be a lesson for all of the community. But still most biologists prefer to go into as much of details as possible without making any generalities and then testing the validity of those generalities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is all right. But, the point I was trying to make in the post was that the use of mathematics in biology community is not prevalent. The once case you have provided should be a lesson for all of the community. But still most biologists prefer to go into as much of details as possible without making any generalities and then testing the validity of those generalities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jagadish</title>
		<link>http://paraschopra.com/blog/biology/laws-of-biology.htm/comment-page-1#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Jagadish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">GUID#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Gunter Bolbel, Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1999 one perfect example to say that biologist do work based on the frame work of logical and rational hypothesis. The theory he proposed for the protein sorting won him the accolade. bilogy is not either physics or for that matter any other subject it needs to know the finest of the finest information which will provide basis for many biomediacl application. At the same time when we talk of function we have to formulate the hypothesis to begin the work.
Hope i am to your comment. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gunter Bolbel, Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1999 one perfect example to say that biologist do work based on the frame work of logical and rational hypothesis. The theory he proposed for the protein sorting won him the accolade. bilogy is not either physics or for that matter any other subject it needs to know the finest of the finest information which will provide basis for many biomediacl application. At the same time when we talk of function we have to formulate the hypothesis to begin the work.<br />
Hope i am to your comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
